|
Want
to know how you can support conservation tax incentive legislation?
IRS Issues Private
Letter Ruling on Estate Tax Law
from Exchange, Summer
2000
The U.S. Internal Revenue
Service in March made public its first private
letter ruling under Section 2031(c)
of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), the tax law allowing a new estate
tax exclusion for certain land under conservation easements.
While the IRS specifies that
its letter rulings discuss only the case presented for the ruling,
and should not be cited as a legal precedent, they are often used
for guidance in interpreting laws and to understand the IRS's current
thinking.
The ruling was requested
by Boston, MA-based attorney Stephen J. Small on behalf of the estate
of a western rancher. At the time of the rancher's death, a trust
he controlled owned the majority of the stock in a corporation,
and a ranch with a number of conservation easements on it. The rancher's
wife succeeded him as trustee of the trust, and she was also executor
of his estate. She and the other surviving shareholders wanted to
know if IRC 2031(c) estate tax benefits could be available to his
estate.
Mr. Small advised that, in
order for the easement to qualify for the estate tax benefits under
IRC 2031(c), all but "de minimis commercial recreational activities"
must be extinguished. He also recommended extinguishing remaining
subdivision rights on the property to maximize the law's estate
tax benefits.
"What really complicated
the situation was that a corporation owned the ranch," said
Mr. Small. "There was no clear legal authority on exactly how
these rights could be extinguished. Even though we thought we knew
the course of action to pursue, we suggested getting a letter ruling."
Perhaps the most significant
clarification the IRS made in the ruling is that "unspecified,
non-prohibited commercial activity" - such as the right to
conduct commercial recreational activity -- is considered a development
right, and can be terminated under the provisions of 2031(c), Mr.
Small noted. "One relatively easy way to do this is by amending
the existing easement after the death of the landowner," he
said.
The ruling also noted that
a written agreement among the surviving corporate shareholders to
permanently extinguish the recreation and subdivision rights could
satisfy the qualification requirements, if the agreement was executed
on or before the due date for the estate tax filing return (nine
months after the decedent's death), and included with the filing
form (Form 706).
"This is a very unusual
provision in 2031(c)," Mr. Small explained. "What it says
is you can agree in writing to do something and you can file an
estate tax return based on that agreement. Usually you can't file
any tax return that's based on a promise that you will do something
quite this complicated in the future."
Nevertheless, there were
safeguards in the agreement in this case, Mr. Small noted. "We
said in the agreement that all the people who signed would be liable
for any additional estate tax that would be due if for some reason
the development rights weren't extinguished as agreed."
Soon after the private letter
ruling was made, the corporation completed one new conservation
easement on the entire ranch, essentially amending, restating and
tightening the prior conservation easements on the property, eliminating
the retained subdivision rights and prohibiting any commercial recreational
activity.
Read
the private letter ruling.
Section
2031(c) of the IRC
posted 9/6/00
|